I did create a module manager which uses the *Makefile* and *module.l*, but
the code is not clean and it doesn't entirely work the way I want, so I
haven't released it. I don't think I would have time to release anything
before the end of summer, so feel free to take a stab at it if you think
this type of thing is necessary for PicoLisp.
It's a tough problem, so care must be taken to avoid re-creating NPM ;)
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:18 AM, <andr...@itship.ch> wrote:
> Hi Erik, thanks for the hint!
> I discussed this topic with Alex Williams before, but somehow I wasn't
> aware of what he did here with the Makefile.
> That's really neat, something like this really should be intergrated in a
> module management, I think.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Erik Gustafson [mailto:erik.d.gustaf...@gmail.com]
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Sent: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:59:23 -0500
> Alex Williams is onto something. Checkout
> https://github.com/aw/picolisp-nanomsg, notably the Makefile and module.l.
> Works very well!
> On Monday, June 29, 2015, <andr...@itship.ch> wrote:
> > Hi Rick
> > > Basically, I'm wondering if there is a project management tool like
> > > Maven (Java), Leiningen (Clojure), Cask (Elisp), ASDF (CL), but for
> > > picoLisp. I'd also be interested in hearing arguments for or against
> > > such a thing. (Not having used these tools, I'm ok just manually
> > > keeping these things up, but many of you here are more experienced
> > > than I in deploying and maintaining software, so I'd appreciate your
> > > thoughts.)
> > Check this thread:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp%40software-lab.de/msg05140.html
> > I'm attempting to do something on that topic, if anyone already has a
> > solution or additional ideas, contact me please.
> > - beneroth