Hi, I did create a module manager which uses the *Makefile* and *module.l*, but the code is not clean and it doesn't entirely work the way I want, so I haven't released it. I don't think I would have time to release anything before the end of summer, so feel free to take a stab at it if you think this type of thing is necessary for PicoLisp.
It's a tough problem, so care must be taken to avoid re-creating NPM ;) AW On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:18 AM, <andr...@itship.ch> wrote: > Hi Erik, thanks for the hint! > > I discussed this topic with Alex Williams before, but somehow I wasn't > aware of what he did here with the Makefile. > That's really neat, something like this really should be intergrated in a > module management, I think. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Erik Gustafson [mailto:erik.d.gustaf...@gmail.com] > To: picolisp@software-lab.de > Sent: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 02:59:23 -0500 > Subject: > > Alex Williams is onto something. Checkout > https://github.com/aw/picolisp-nanomsg, notably the Makefile and module.l. > Works very well! > > On Monday, June 29, 2015, <andr...@itship.ch> wrote: > > > Hi Rick > > > > > Basically, I'm wondering if there is a project management tool like > > > Maven (Java), Leiningen (Clojure), Cask (Elisp), ASDF (CL), but for > > > picoLisp. I'd also be interested in hearing arguments for or against > > > such a thing. (Not having used these tools, I'm ok just manually > > > keeping these things up, but many of you here are more experienced > > > than I in deploying and maintaining software, so I'd appreciate your > > > thoughts.) > > > > Check this thread: > > https://www.mail-archive.com/picolisp%40software-lab.de/msg05140.html > > > > I'm attempting to do something on that topic, if anyone already has a > > solution or additional ideas, contact me please. > > > > - beneroth > > > > > >
