On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:37:02PM -0500, Erik Gustafson wrote: > > We might define > > ... > > '(("E") (and "E" (run (cdr "Args")))) # 'and' sets '@'
> I love this! And you're right, it's even more cute. That's a really clever > use of 'and'. Is that fairly common in PicoLisp code? Yes. I always have in mind that 'and' sets the value of '@' (like the other functions in http://software-lab.de/doc/ref.html#atres under "Flow functions". A more traditional way would be '(("E") (let @ "E" (run (cdr "Args")))) i.e. explicitly bind the symbol with 'let'. But I obviously wasn't careful! Why make it so complicated? The "right" way is of course: '((@) (run (cdr "Args"))) With that, the whole function is (de map@ "Args" (mapcar '((@) (run (cdr "Args"))) (eval (car "Args")) ) ) ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe