If you can choose, I don't know what are you waiting for... have fun!

2015-07-20 13:03 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila <amherag@gmailcom>:

> Not using BLAS or LAPACK.
> 2015-07-20 3:53 GMT-07:00 Manuel Cano <manutalc...@gmail.com>:
>> What gives you more fun?
>> 2015-07-20 12:18 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila <amhe...@gmail.com>:
>>> I appreciate people who know the term "computational intelligence."
>>> PicoCI sounds good.
>>> I know that BLAS and LAPACK are battle-tested, but in that case I would
>>> just use other libraries in other programming languages (this is how I
>>> feel). I've been doing CI in common lisp using clml, mgl-gpr, mgl, and
>>> others, and I even have access to run my models in CUDA GPUs with my
>>> current setup. I'd like to see PilOS running CI in a near future, and
>>> without the dependencies on fortran's BLAS and LAPACK.
>>> I'm still open to constructive criticism. Should we take a purist
>>> approach or should we go the battle-tested safer route?
>>> 2015-07-20 2:32 GMT-07:00 Robert Herman <rpjher...@gmail.com>:
>>>> I would welcome the results of your efforts, and contribute where I
>>>> could, but I think it would be best to make calls to BLAS and LAPACK, since
>>>> they are battle-tested. I am currently working my way through a book
>>>> 'Handbook of Neuroevolution through Erlang', but I prefer Lisp. Erlang is
>>>> just better at the fault tolerance, distributed thing.
>>>> Lush2 Lisp was used for heavy numerics, so you may want to look there
>>>> for some guidance, however the Sourceforge site is down at the moment.
>>>> I am currently trying to get PilOS running on Qemu on a Win 8.1 64bit
>>>> machine. I'd love to have that and computational intelligence libraries
>>>> working in 64bit PicoLisp! Hey, how about PicoCi or PicoCI?
>>>> Rob
>>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Rowan Thorpe <ro...@rowanthorpe.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On 2015/07/20-01:01, Amaury Hernández Águila wrote:
>>>>> > I think this will be an exciting project. I'll try a pure PicoLisp
>>>>> > implementation and see how far I can go. Any suggestions to the name
>>>>> of the
>>>>> > library? PicoML sounds good.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Currently, I would start with a fuzzy logic toolbox, genetic
>>>>> programming
>>>>> > and an architecture to create multi-agent systems. The second step
>>>>> would be
>>>>> > to create neural networks.
>>>>> If you will develop on a public repo, please do send this thread a
>>>>> link to it
>>>>> when you feel it is at a point that others could send pull-requests to
>>>>> (or open
>>>>> issues for) to help with the progress.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Rowan Thorpe
>>>>> PGP fingerprint:
>>>>>  BB0A 0787 C0EE BDD8 7F97  3D30 49F2 13A5 265D CCBD
>>>>> ----
>>>>> "There is a great difference between worry and concern. A worried
>>>>> person sees
>>>>> a problem, and a concerned person solves a problem."
>>>>>  - Harold Stephens
>>>>> --
>>>>> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
>> --
>> Manuel


Reply via email to