Hi all,

On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:48:26PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> problem is like this code:
> http://pastebin.com/ZzSXgsUa

Oh! This seems to be a bug

   (setq X (new)) (prinl X)

Must be my fault. I never had the idea to 'prinl' an anonymous symbol
('prinl' just low-level-outputs the names of symbols, but anonymous
symbols don't have a name ;)

Perhaps it works in pil64 just by chance. I'll check (and fix) both
versions).

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to