Hi all, On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 06:48:26PM +0300, Mike Pechkin wrote: > problem is like this code: > http://pastebin.com/ZzSXgsUa
Oh! This seems to be a bug
(setq X (new)) (prinl X)
Must be my fault. I never had the idea to 'prinl' an anonymous symbol
('prinl' just low-level-outputs the names of symbols, but anonymous
symbols don't have a name ;)
Perhaps it works in pil64 just by chance. I'll check (and fix) both
versions).
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe
