Ok, Danilo...  How about this then? :) http://www.technoblogy.com/show?1GX1

N.B. It's still "micro", not "pico"...  I don't know how to evaluate a lisp 
engine/language spec, but I know that picolisp is older and more widely used 
(and it feels right to me).


> From: Danilo Kordic
> Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2016 7:02 AM
> Interesting.  Well nice try, I wouldn't call it v1.0 :D .  It's Arduino (not 
> AVR!), nuf' said.  
>> From: Loyall, David 
>> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 11:50 AM
>> Perhaps picolisp can learn something from this project, but I expect they 
>> can learn more from picolisp.
>> http://www.ulisp.com/

Reply via email to