On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 03:14:54PM +0200, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote:
> On my machine (2010 netbook with Intel Atom core using PIL version (3 1 8
> 0)) i get the following numbers from bench:
> 8.627 sec '(nth)
> 5.331 sec '(lup)
> ...
> 2016-10-01 14:41 GMT+02:00 Mike Pechkin <mike.pech...@gmail.com>:
> > http://pastebin.com/SQ6FtdCx
> >
> > Note: balance+lup gives more profit under pil64 on the same hardware.

Interesting indeed (though a length of only 256 is a border case for
'nth' versus 'idx')!

On my tablet (Nexus9 / ARMv8) I see

   4.771 sec
   2.731 sec

while on an old 32-bit Netbook I get

   9.735 sec
   15.759 sec

which is rather surprising, because the 'idx' version takes
significantly longer than the linear list!

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to