I noted that '  let you write as many nested parens as you wanted but
precluded any evaluation in the middle. V was just there to ensure that
EVALUATION was required to get at "some_str" i.e. to test any solution.
Irrespective....thank you for 'fill

On 23 December 2016 at 08:46, Joh-Tob Schäg <johtob...@gmail.com> wrote:

> What is the purpose of the symbol V? Is seems like dead code to me. Please
> check your code for correctness before asking question. The first line does
> not make any sense for another reason.
>
> If you want to have a the list (a (("String"))) use:
> (setq L (append L '((("String")))))
>
> I assume you wanted to have the value of V in there instead of a constant
> "String". Have a look at 'fill in this case.
>
> 2016-12-22 21:09 GMT+01:00 dean <deangwillia...@gmail.com>:
>
>> What is the right way to do this...
>> (setq V "some_str")
>> (setq L '(a))
>> (setq L (append L ???))
>> --> (  a   ((some_str))    )
>> i.e. I can do '((some_str))
>> but wonder if there's an easy way to use '(()) AND have an evaluated
>> value in the middle
>> i.e quote makes specifying any level of parens easy but doesn't let my
>> use an evaluated value in the middle.
>> Sorry if this is a dumb question
>>
>
>

Reply via email to