Hi Bruno,

> I didn't know about picolisp's tolerance for nested symbols. Is there a
> reason you chose this?
> Like, it lets you write some cool code, or it makes the language more
> robust?

Not at all. It is the very basic functionality of the interpreter. Without it,
nothing would work. The CAR of an expression must be evaluated, to get a
function.

It happens already here:

   : +
   -> 22942035797

   : (+ 3 4)  # Eval the symbol '+', call 22942035797
   -> 7

- Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to