Thank you very much for this idea, Alex! That works for me very fine, as (wait 1) seems to be sufficient and so no extra delay is visible on screen.
Thanks a lot, Olaf > Gesendet: Sonntag, 05. Februar 2017 um 08:58 Uhr > Von: "Alexander Burger" <a...@software-lab.de> > An: email@example.com > Betreff: Re: write from pl-script into named pipe on shell > > Hi Olaf, > > > Println is not the key, I also played around with flush and sync and tell > > and every word I saw in rosetta examples :-) > > It seems the bash is not fast enough. At least it works if I put (wait 1000) > between the calls to (out "listener" ..). > > This still does not really make sense to me, as the data should be queued in > the > pipe. But perhaps bash flushes or re-initializes it upon each open? > > > > But no problem at all - enjoy the weekend :-) > > Same! :) > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe > -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe