And I would be interested in working on a package or module system similar to "pip" for Python.
I must confess that most discussions about namespaces etc on this list is way over my head... however could I be on the right track if I were to assume that using "local" in such modules would be a good start, so as to only export deliberately exposed symbols from a package? > 24 feb. 2017 kl. 08:45 skrev Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de>: > > Hi Erik, > > thanks for the long post! > > Just in short: > >> 'Learn PicoLisp the Hard Way' > > I totally agree. This would be a great project, I'm ready to join. > Same for Stack Overflow support. > > >> And let's make sure said landing page is served over HTTPS. It's 2017. > > Yes, yes, I know ;) In fact, it is on my todo list since half a year. > > I want to use Let's Encrypt, as I already do on another server. However, the > picolisp.com server is currently a mix of Wheezy, Jessie and Stretch, and > whatever I tried to get the certbot running resulted in a storm of Python > package mismatch error messages. No way .. I gave up, and decided to wait > until > Debian Stretch is stable and thus available from my provider. > > ♪♫ Alex > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:email@example.com?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe