And I would be interested in working on a package or module system similar to
"pip" for Python.
I must confess that most discussions about namespaces etc on this list is way
over my head... however could I be on the right track if I were to assume that
using "local" in such modules would be a good start, so as to only export
deliberately exposed symbols from a package?
> 24 feb. 2017 kl. 08:45 skrev Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de>:
> Hi Erik,
> thanks for the long post!
> Just in short:
>> 'Learn PicoLisp the Hard Way'
> I totally agree. This would be a great project, I'm ready to join.
> Same for Stack Overflow support.
>> And let's make sure said landing page is served over HTTPS. It's 2017.
> Yes, yes, I know ;) In fact, it is on my todo list since half a year.
> I want to use Let's Encrypt, as I already do on another server. However, the
> picolisp.com server is currently a mix of Wheezy, Jessie and Stretch, and
> whatever I tried to get the certbot running resulted in a storm of Python
> package mismatch error messages. No way .. I gave up, and decided to wait
> Debian Stretch is stable and thus available from my provider.
> ♪♫ Alex
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe