Hi Christopher, thanks for sharing these ideas!
However I'm a bit clueless about what you want to achieve. > Hi, I while ago I asked how I might somehow represent a loop as a a tail > call recursion, so as to give me the pattern I like without the call > penalties. Isn't it a lot easier to write a 'while', 'for' or 'do' loop then? ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org?subject=Unsubscribe