If `lambda' (Lisp-defined Procedures) is `lst' why `num' is not?!

  Even if both `num' and `cnt' are defined in `structures', why `num'
can not be operated on as a `lst' that it is?!

  I think it would be (uber cute) to implement `num' as `lst' of `cnt'
as pure PL lib :) .  Even in 32-bit version.

  I think `(doc 'eval)' should be the main part of the Reference :) .
As we all know, to implement (define) Lisp /just/ `eval' is enough.
Who needs 7 primitives ;) ?  `(doc 'lst)' (and `fun'...) is missing :)

Reply via email to