On Sat, Oct 14, 2017 at 7:48 AM, Alexander Burger <a...@software-lab.de> wrote: > You are close :)
Hi Alex, Thanks, I'm making some progress at last! A personal lesson: when meta-programming, I should make more use of pp. > I would do this: > > (de decar Lst > (def (++ Lst) > (let Var (++ Lst) > (cons > Var > (list 'setq Var (list 'car Var)) > Lst ) ) ) ) Thanks, it works at home too, but with pop instead of ++ (I'm using EmuLisp). I just replaced (++ Lst) with (pop 'Lst). I'm quite surprised of the use of setq instead of let. Could you please elaborate? More precisely, I would have thought that (foo smthng) would have bound 'smthng to X. chri -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
