>This is not correct. -'(and (mime ...))' results in ((and (...))) and
>will most
>probably crash (executes the *return* value of 'and' as a function).

Right! Luckily it didn't crash here.

>The 'and' is not needed anyway. I would recommend
>...
>or, better, create a file which initializes it all.

The best one. Especially, when the command starts to get long to this end.

-- 
SuperSaiyan Blue

--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:[email protected]?subject=Unsubscribe

Reply via email to