On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 07:23:45PM -0800, Lindsay Lawrence wrote: > I gave 'tco' a try. I appreciate the syntax. The similarity with existing > recur syntax > makes it trivial to convert code where tail calls are possible.
You can also have use cases for both at the same time. For example, a tree can be iterated by recursing on the left branches and then looping on the right branches: : (use Idx (balance 'Idx (range 1 7)) (recur (Idx) (tco (Idx) (when Idx (printsp (car Idx)) (recurse (cadr Idx)) (tc (cddr Idx)) ) ) ) ) 4 2 1 3 6 5 7 -> NIL ☺/ A!ex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe