If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while, then I'd +1 1.0.0. I think Pig is stable enough.


On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:

+1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that stable?


On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:

Pig Developers and Committers,

Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.

I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a major
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable


Reply via email to