If we're committing to backward compatibility for a while, then I'd +1
1.0.0. I think Pig is stable enough.
On Mar 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
+1 on doing a release. +0 on calling it 1.0. Are we really that
On Mar 6, 2009, at 5:28 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:
Pig Developers and Committers,
Now that types branch is merged into trunk and the dust settled, I
propose that it is time for the next release.
I propose that we name this release as Pig 1.0.0 since this is a
rework and a much more stable and performant code with stable