From: Alan Gates [mailto:ga...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate release
number, I propose that we release the same code under the name 0.2.0.
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
> -1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not quite
> there. I would prefer 0.2.0
> 1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
> a little bit more work.
> 2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
> 3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store interfaces
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
> Pig Committers,
> I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
> This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser down.
> also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
> The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files listed
> as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
> Keys used to sign the release are available at
> Please download, test, and try it out:
> Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.