BTW, at this point I'm more concerned that we get a release out than
what it is called. I do think Pig is stable enough for 1.0 but I'm
not willing to let version numbering get in the way of getting a
release out. More frequent releases is better for the community.
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Nigel Daley wrote:
On Mar 23, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
To address Santhosh's concerns that 1.0 is not an appropriate
release number, I propose that we release the same code under the
On Mar 20, 2009, at 11:54 AM, Santhosh Srinivasan wrote:
-1 on the 1.0.0 release. IMHO, Pig is relatively stable but not
there. I would prefer 0.2.0
1. 1.0.0 signifies a highly stable and solid release which will
a little bit more work.
2. Multi-query support will break the way users are using grunt
3. There are ongoing efforts for changing load and/or store
From: Olga Natkovich [mailto:ol...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2009 3:21 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Pig 1.0.0 (candidate 0)
I have created a candidate build for Pig 1.0.0.
This release represents a major rewrite of Pig from the parser
also introduced type system into Pig and greatly improved system
The rat report is attached. Note that there are many java files
as being without a license header. All these files are generated by
Keys used to sign the release are available at
Please download, test, and try it out:
Should we release this? Vote closes on Friday, March 20th.