[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12757330#action_12757330
]
Daniel Dai commented on PIG-948:
--------------------------------
If Hadoop expose it, then there is no problem to include. But I don't think
Hadoop expose this construction. I agree it is minimal to maintain and useful
to many users. What I concern is to put undocumented Hadoop features into Pig
code. I do not object to that, but I feel I need more inputs because we break a
convention.
How does other developers feel?
> [Usability] Relating pig script with MR jobs
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-948
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-948
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: impl
> Reporter: Ashutosh Chauhan
> Assignee: Ashutosh Chauhan
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: pig-948.patch
>
>
> Currently its hard to find a way to relate pig script with specific MR job.
> In a loaded cluster with multiple simultaneous job submissions, its not easy
> to figure out which specific MR jobs were launched for a given pig script. If
> Pig can provide this info, it will be useful to debug and monitor the jobs
> resulting from a pig script.
> At the very least, Pig should be able to provide user the following
> information
> 1) Job id of the launched job.
> 2) Complete web url of jobtracker running this job.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
