Daniel Dai commented on PIG-948:

If Hadoop expose it, then there is no problem to include. But I don't think 
Hadoop expose this construction. I agree it is minimal to maintain and useful 
to many users. What I concern is to put undocumented Hadoop features into Pig 
code. I do not object to that, but I feel I need more inputs because we break a 

How does other developers feel?

> [Usability] Relating pig script with MR jobs
> --------------------------------------------
>                 Key: PIG-948
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-948
>             Project: Pig
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: impl
>            Reporter: Ashutosh Chauhan
>            Assignee: Ashutosh Chauhan
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: pig-948.patch
> Currently its hard to find a way to relate pig script with specific MR job. 
> In a loaded cluster with multiple simultaneous job submissions, its not easy 
> to figure out which specific MR jobs were launched for a given pig script. If 
> Pig can provide this info, it will be useful to debug and monitor the jobs 
> resulting from a pig script.
> At the very least, Pig should be able to provide user the following 
> information
> 1) Job id of the launched job.
> 2) Complete web url of jobtracker running this job. 

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to