In that case I have no objections to cutting the release. -Dmitriy
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > This is a change in an error message. I don't think it qualifies as a > release blocker and that is why we did not back port the patch to the > 0.6.0 branch. > > Olga > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:20 PM > To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: time to release Pig 0.6.0 > > Having just been hit by this -- any chance we can put > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1075 into 0.6? > > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: >> As far as we know, there are no changes in 0.6.0 that break backward >> compatibility neither in scripts nor in UDFs. The only modifications >> that changes things a bit is moving local mode from native to > Hadoop's. >> >> Olga >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 10:44 AM >> To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: time to release Pig 0.6.0 >> >> Olga, >> Are there any changes in 0.6 that are not backwards-compatible, or is >> all that only in trunk? >> >> -Dmitriy >> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> >> wrote: >>> Pig Developers, >>> >>> >>> >>> Since we have branched for the release, we have fixed a lot of bugs >> and >>> stabilized the code quite a bit. There are no outstanding blockers > for >>> 0.6.0. >>> >>> >>> >>> I suggest that we cut the release. Please, let me know if you have > any >>> objections; otherwise, I will start the release process tomorrow. >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >>> >>> Olga >>> >>> >> >
