[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841601#action_12841601
]
Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1269:
--------------------------------
+1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12437911/patch.0304
against trunk revision 919109.
+1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.
+1 tests included. The patch appears to include 60 new or modified tests.
+1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.
+1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac
compiler warnings.
+1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs warnings.
+1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of
release audit warnings.
+1 core tests. The patch passed core unit tests.
+1 contrib tests. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-h7.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/224/testReport/
Findbugs warnings:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-h7.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/224/artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output:
http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-h7.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/224/console
This message is automatically generated.
> [Zebra] Restrict schema definition for collection
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: PIG-1269
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1269
> Project: Pig
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Xuefu Zhang
> Assignee: Xuefu Zhang
> Fix For: 0.7.0
>
> Attachments: patch.0304, zebra.0302
>
>
> Currently Zebra grammar for schema definition for collection field allows
> many types of definition. To reduce complexity and remove ambiguity, and more
> importantly, to make the meta data more representative of the actual data
> instances, the grammar rules need to be changed. Only a record type is
> allowed and required for collection definition. Thus,
> fieldName:collection(record(c1:int, c2:string)) is legal, while
> fieldName:collection(c1:int, c2:string),
> fieldName:collection(f:record(c1:int, c2:string)),
> fieldName:collection(c1:int), or feildName:collection(int) is illegal.
> This will have some impact on existing Zebra M/R programs or Pig scripts that
> use Zebra. Schema acceptable in previous release now may become illegal
> because of this change. This should be clearly documented.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
