No, that one is Hudson. While it was on, uh, medical leave, a bunch of patches got committed, so now I am guessing it's trying to apply a patch to a tree that already has said patch in it. Don't worry about it, this patch is already in trunk.
-D On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Russell Jurney <russell.jur...@gmail.com>wrote: > Arg, I am terrible at making patches :( > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Hadoop QA (JIRA) <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > [ > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12872194#action_12872194 > ] > > > > Hadoop QA commented on PIG-1420: > > -------------------------------- > > > > -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12444886/addconcat2.patch > > against trunk revision 948526. > > > > +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. > > > > +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 6 new or modified > > tests. > > > > -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. > > > > Console output: > > > http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Pig-Patch-h1.grid.sp2.yahoo.net/5/console > > > > This message is automatically generated. > > > > > Make CONCAT act on all fields of a tuple, instead of just the first two > > fields of a tuple > > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Key: PIG-1420 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1420 > > > Project: Pig > > > Issue Type: Improvement > > > Components: impl > > > Affects Versions: 0.8.0 > > > Reporter: Russell Jurney > > > Assignee: Russell Jurney > > > Fix For: 0.8.0 > > > > > > Attachments: addconcat2.patch > > > > > > Original Estimate: 24h > > > Remaining Estimate: 24h > > > > > > org.apache.pig.builtin.CONCAT (which acts on DataByteArray's > internally) > > and org.apache.pig.builtin.StringConcat (which acts on Strings > internally), > > both act on the first two fields of a tuple. This results in ugly nested > > CONCAT calls like: > > > CONCAT(CONCAT(A, ' '), B) > > > The more desirable form is: > > > CONCAT(A, ' ', B) > > > This change will be backwards compatible, provided that no one was > > relying on the fact that CONCAT ignores fields after the first two in a > > tuple. This seems a reasonable assumption to make, or at least a small > > break in compatibility for a sizable improvement. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > > >
