Would love to see Pig as a TLP. +1. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Great, +1 > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Olga Natkovich <ol...@yahoo-inc.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dmitriy Ryaboy [mailto:dvrya...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 5:00 PM > > To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Restarting discussion on Pig as a TLP > > > > This sounds reasonable. +1. > > -D > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Alan Gates <ga...@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > > > > > Five months ago I started a discussion on whether Pig should become a > top > > > level project (TLP) at Apache instead of remaining a subproject of > Hadoop > > ( > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-pig-dev/201003.mbox/%3c006aea7c-8829-4788-ad7b-822396fa2...@yahoo-inc.com%3e > > ). > > > At the time I voted against it ( > > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-pig-dev/201003.mbox/%3cf1484964-e774-48b7-9d45-6e57c7b09...@yahoo-inc.com%3e > > ), > > > as did many others. However, I would like to restart that discussion > > now. > > > > > > I gave several reasons for voting against it : > > > > > > First, I was worried that by loosing our connection to Hadoop, Pig > would > > > loose its source of new users. I have since been assured by Hadoop > > members > > > that Pig would be free to keep our tab on their page (as Hbase has). > > Also, > > > obviously we would still be welcomed at Hadoop get togethers such as > the > > > various HUGs, Hadoop Summits, etc. So our connection does not seem in > > > danger. > > > > > > Two, I was concerned that by not being members of the Hadoop community > we > > > would loose influence with Hadoop. It is true that Pig developers will > > have > > > to stay active in the Hadoop community, which will put a slightly extra > > > burden on them. But they are already bearing this burden, and whether > or > > > not the communities are governed by the same or separate PMCs will not > > > affect this. > > > > > > Finally, I said that philosophically it makes sense to me that all > Hadoop > > > related projects should stay under one umbrella. This still makes > sense > > to > > > me, and I do see this as a downside of Pig moving out of Hadoop. > > > > > > In addition to the above, a few other things have happened over the > > > intervening months to cause me to reconsider. Most importantly, it has > > > become clear to me that Pig is operating as if it were a TLP inside > > Hadoop. > > > We have four members on the Hadoop PMC, which means we have sufficient > > > votes to elect our committers and release our products. > > > > > > Also, several Hadoop PMC members who have long experience in Apache > > > projects have made clear to me that they believe Pig is ready to be a > > TLP. > > > > > > I was also concerned about diversity in our PMC, since our project is > > Yahoo > > > heavy. Given that 10 out of 12 committers are Yahoo employees we need > to > > > work on this. But we do have experienced committers in three different > > > organizations, and I think this gives us sufficient base to to work on > it > > as > > > a TLP. > > > > > > So, in summary, I have switched my view on this from "not yet" to "now > is > > a > > > good time". I think Pig is ready to be a TLP. We have a community of > > > contributors and users that is growing both in numbers and in > diversity. > > We > > > have a strong group of committers who I believe are ready to take on > > > leadership of the project and who will benefit from being mentored by > the > > > larger Apache community. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > Alan. > > > > > > > > > -- > Best Regards > > Jeff Zhang >
