Currently, there are really 1-2 people that pop out in design discussions. I would agree on anything that will make us more like a real community!
However, the main idea will never change. The more usable application = more users = more developers. Pi On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't get me wrong ...but personally I would like to see a little more > activity on dev list for a graduation. > That said - I also think it would be beneficial. For both projects! > > cheers > -- > Torsten > > > On May 30, 2008, at 22:25, Olga Natkovich wrote: > > Hi, >> >> What do people think about becoming a Hadoop subproject? >> >> A couple of advantages of this approach: >> >> - Having direct access to hadoop user community would be good for Pig >> adoption >> - Being part of a more mature open source project would help in >> attracting more developers and committers. Also, it will allow us to >> avoid the cost of administrative overhead. >> >> Now this, of course, would not mean architecturally depending on Hadoop. >> I believe that maintaining backend independence is an important goal for >> Pig. >> >> Comments? >> >> Olga >> > >
