Pipeline optimization for multiple reduces
------------------------------------------

                 Key: PIG-318
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-318
             Project: Pig
          Issue Type: Improvement
            Reporter: Olga Natkovich


Any time we chain together M-R jobs, we doing it because we need separate 
reducer like with group by followed by order by. We don't really need the maps. 
The ideal graph for us would be:
 
M->R->SortShuffle->R->SortShuffle->R ...
 
This would allow us to save read from DFs and write to the local disk which 
could be fairly significant.

Aparently this similar discussion took place on hadoop mailing list several 
times and this request was turned down. Main reason is that in their opinion 
cost of implementing something like that would outweigh the benefit. 

To make a persuasive case, we need to measure the overhead of the empty maps 
for "typical" queries.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to