Ok, I added license to all files accept for data files. This will be included in the next candidate.
Also I tried to rename javacc.jar but looks like there is now way to pass the new name to ant so I rolled that back. If you ran the jar, you can see the version anyway. Olga > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Bertrand Delacretaz > Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 9:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Pig 0.1.0 (candidate 0) > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:41 PM, Olga Natkovich > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> ...please have a look to see if those can be added without causing > >> problems: > >> > >> !????? ./src/org/apache/pig/impl/logicalLayer/parser/grammar > >> !????? ./tutotial/data/excite-small.log !????? > >> ./tutotial/scripts/script1-hadoop.pig > >> !????? ./tutotial/scripts/script1-local.pig > >> !????? ./tutotial/scripts/script2-hadoop.pig > >> !????? ./tutotial/scripts/script2-local.pig > > > > All this files are either data as the case with excite-small.log or > > pig scripts or a grammar file. I don't think we can put > license in the data. > > I could add it to the other files but I saw that some > similar Hadoop > > files did not have license. Do all files need to have it?... > > The rule is that any file which contains "creative expression" > requires AL headers (see [1] for example). Now, people might > disagree about what that creative expression is. > > Log files are obviously not in this category. I don't know > about the small pig examples, but if the parser grammar is an > essential part of Pig I'd say that it does require the > license header, assuming the grammar language allows it. > > -Bertrand > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/gzppsey45yn4gpi4 >
