-----Original Message-----
From: Corbin Hoenes [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:57 AM
To: Olga Natkovich
Subject: Re: SpillableMemoryManager - low memory handler called

I have attached the script... please let me know if you have more
questions.  

On May 6, 2010, at 12:36 PM, Olga Natkovich wrote:

> This is just a warning saying that your job is spilling to the disk.
> Please, if you can, post a script that is causing this issue. In 0.6.0
> we moved large chunk of the code away from using SpillableMemoryManager
> but it is still used in some places. More changes are coming in 0.7.0 as
> well.
> 
> Olga
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Corbin Hoenes [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 11:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SpillableMemoryManager - low memory handler called
> 
> 0.6
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On May 6, 2010, at 12:16 PM, "Olga Natkovich" <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
> 
>> Which version of Pig are you using?
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Corbin Hoenes [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 10:29 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: SpillableMemoryManager - low memory handler called
>> 
>> Hi Piggers - Seeing an issue with a particular script where our job is
>> taking 6hrs 42min to complete.
>> 
>> syslogs are showing loads of these:
>> INFO : org.apache.pig.impl.util.SpillableMemoryManager - low memory
>> handler called (Usage threshold exceeded) init = 5439488(5312K) used =
>> 283443200(276800K) committed = 357957632(349568K) max =
>> 357957632(349568K)
>> INFO : org.apache.pig.impl.util.SpillableMemoryManager - low memory
>> handler called (Usage threshold exceeded) init = 5439488(5312K) used =
>> 267128840(260868K) committed = 357957632(349568K) max =
>> 357957632(349568K)
>> One iteresting thing is it's the map phase that is slow and one of the
>> mappers is getting 8GB of input while the other 2000 or so mappers are
>> getting MBs and hundreds of MBs of data.
>> 
>> Any where I can start looking?
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to