LIMIT is an extra line to type. But I guess if we're using pig, we don't
really care for elegance and concision huh?


On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy <[email protected]> wrote:

> hc, two things about that approach :
>
> 1) if you use the accumulator interface, the bag won't be materialized
> 2) am I missing something? Why can't you just use LIMIT 1?
>
> -D
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 10:39 AM, hc busy <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Write a UDF called
> >
> > takeOne()
> >
> > that takes the first thing from the bag and returns it. The only problem
> > that I'm having is that this UDF cannot signal to pig that it is done. So
> > that whole bag is always created in it's entirety.
> >
> >
> > Btw, this UDF will be able to accomplish the same task (picking out one
> > item
> > out fo a bag)
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIG-1386
> >
> > because MaxTupleByNthField extends the original MaxTupleBy1stField by
> > allowing you to specify any column in the tuple as the comparison key.
> And
> > because it handles typing correctly, your schema will be as you expect
> > automatically.
> >
> > sessions = GROUP sessions BY sid;
> > sessions = FOREACH sessions { first = LIMIT sessions 1; GENERATE
> > FLATTEN(first);};
> > sessions = FOREACH sessions GENERATE sid, .. and all the fields I have in
> > the session table...
> >
> >
> > is replaced with
> >
> > session = GROUP session by sid;
> > session = FOREACH session generate MaxTupleByNthField(session);
> >
> > that's it. it'll have the right schema, all columns from before, but
> choses
> > one of the data points.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Scott Carey <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > I run into this situation all the time.  You have to do a foreach ...
> > > generate projection at the end to rename everything.
> > >
> > > The way aliases work in pig, you quite often have to do 'renaming only'
> > > projections if you don't want to make other bits of code later change:
> > > After the group and limit:
> > >
> > > sessions = FOREACH sessions GENERATE field1 as field1, field2 as
> field2,
> > > field3 ad field3 . . .
> > >
> > > That will get rid of the :: prefixes and make the alias shareable with
> > > later pig code and not dependent on what you do in the group to filter
> > data.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jul 13, 2010, at 1:48 AM, Vincent Barat wrote:
> > >
> > > >  Actually you are right: the schema is the same, nevertheless, the
> > > > "naming" of the various columns in the schema is modified, and thus
> > > > my subsequent operations fail:
> > > >
> > > > original schema:
> > > > sessions: {sid: chararray,infoid: chararray,imei: chararray,start:
> > long}
> > > >
> > > > modified schema:
> > > > sessions: {first::sid: chararray,first::infoid:
> > > > chararray,first::imei: chararray,first::start: long}
> > > >
> > > > Do you know a workaround ?
> > > >
> > > > Le 13/07/10 10:13, Mridul Muralidharan a écrit :
> > > >>
> > > >> The flatten will return the same schema as before (in 'first') :
> > > >> so unless you are modifying the fields or the order in which they
> > > >> are generated (which I dont think you are in view of your comment
> > > >> that it should work with and without this), you can simply go with :
> > > >>
> > > >> -- Or whatever works for you.
> > > >> %define PARALLELISM        '10'
> > > >>
> > > >> sessions = DISTINCT sessions PARALLEL $PARALLELISM;
> > > >>
> > > >> OR
> > > >>
> > > >> sessions = GROUP sessions BY sid  PARALLEL $PARALLELISM;
> > > >> sessions = FOREACH sessions { first = LIMIT sessions 1; GENERATE
> > > >> FLATTEN(first);};
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> The schema at the end would be exactly same as start of the code
> > > >> snippet for 'sessions'.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Mridul
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 01:01 PM, Vincent Barat wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Le 12/07/10 16:56, Mridul Muralidharan a écrit :
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I am not sure what you mean here exactly.
> > > >>>> Will a sid row have multiple (different) values for the other
> > > >>>> fields ?
> > > >>> Yes.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> But if you want to pick any one row for a given sid, then I think
> > > >>>> what you have below might be good enough (you can omit the last
> > > >>>> line though).
> > > >>> OK. Thanks. The last line is used to retrieve the exact same data
> > > >>> structure and naming as the original table. This way, I can
> > > >>> optionally perform this treatment without modifying my code. If you
> > > >>> know a better way...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Cheers,
> > > >>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards,
> > > >>>> Mridul
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Monday 12 July 2010 06:53 PM, Vincent Barat wrote:
> > > >>>>>    Hello everybody,
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I have a simple table containing sessions. Each sessions has an
> > > >>>>> unique key (the sid, which is actually a uuid).
> > > >>>>> But a session can be present several times in my input table.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> I want to ensure that I only have 1 record for each sid (because
> I
> > > >>>>> perform subsequent JOIN based on this sid).
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Currently I use the following script, but I wonder if there is
> > > >>>>> something more efficient:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> sessions = GROUP sessions BY sid;
> > > >>>>> sessions = FOREACH sessions { first = LIMIT sessions 1; GENERATE
> > > >>>>> FLATTEN(first);};
> > > >>>>> sessions = FOREACH sessions GENERATE sid, .. and all the fields I
> > > >>>>> have in the session table...
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Do you see any optimization I can do, especially on the FLATTEN /
> > > >>>>> GENERATE part ?
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thank you very much for your help.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to