Brian Paul <[email protected]> writes: > On 10/09/2012 06:26 PM, Marek Olšák wrote: >> It doesn't test anything. >> --- >> tests/all.tests | 1 - >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tests/all.tests b/tests/all.tests >> index 964c84c..2c99171 100644 >> --- a/tests/all.tests >> +++ b/tests/all.tests >> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ glean['rgbTriStrip'] = GleanTest('rgbTriStrip', res_dir) >> glean['scissor'] = GleanTest('scissor', res_dir) >> glean['shaderAPI'] = GleanTest('shaderAPI', res_dir) >> glean['stencil2'] = GleanTest('stencil2', res_dir) >> -glean['teapot'] = GleanTest('teapot', res_dir) >> glean['texCombine'] = GleanTest('texCombine', res_dir) >> glean['texCube'] = GleanTest('texCube', res_dir) >> glean['texEnv'] = GleanTest('texEnv', res_dir) > > I believe that teapot was added as a performance test (several glean > tests are perf tests). > > The focus of piglit has been correctness but I think it would be nice > to develop a suite of performance measurement tests too. But that's a > whole other discussion.
If anybody builds a performance suite, I bet the teapot won't be in it. (Hopefully we can use apitrace for the job some day, though currently the decompression overhead is too high) Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
pgpLBJkzQPY4h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
