On 11/05/2012 02:53 PM, Chad Versace wrote:
In test egl-create-context-invalid-gl-version, try to create OpenGL ES2
contexts with additional invalid versions: 3.2, 3.9, 4.7.
Fails with mesa-84b437 on Intel Sandybridge.
CC: Matt Turner <matts...@gmail.com>
---
tests/egl/spec/egl_khr_create_context/invalid-gl-version.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/egl/spec/egl_khr_create_context/invalid-gl-version.c
b/tests/egl/spec/egl_khr_create_context/invalid-gl-version.c
index ee33fb9..d83c40b 100644
--- a/tests/egl/spec/egl_khr_create_context/invalid-gl-version.c
+++ b/tests/egl/spec/egl_khr_create_context/invalid-gl-version.c
@@ -82,6 +82,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
pass = pass && try_version(0, 0);
pass = pass && try_version(0, -1);
pass = pass && try_version(1, 2);
+ pass = pass && try_version(3, 2);
+ pass = pass && try_version(3, 9);
+ pass = pass && try_version(4, 7);
All of the other subtests check for GLES versions that can *never* be
value. It is conceivable that someday 3.2 or 3.9 or 4.7 could be valid.
One test that we are missing is a test that tries to create a context of
a particular version and verifies that it got a context of that version.
It seems like that would be the right way to check for this problem.
You may get a context when you ask for 3.2, but I bet
glGetString(GL_VERSION) or glGetIntegerv(GL_MAJOR_VERSION) /
glGetIntegerv(GL_MINOR_VERSION) only say 3.0.
My preference is to not add a test that may break on a future valid
implementation. We need that other test anyway.
EGL_KHR_create_context_teardown();
}
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
