On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Eric Anholt <[email protected]> wrote:
> Matt Turner <[email protected]> writes:
>
> Thy all seem to already print what error was expected, though not what
> was generated.
>
>>       glDrawPixels(1, 1, GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8_EXT, p);
>> -     if (glGetError() != GL_INVALID_OPERATION) {
>> -             sprintf(errorMsg,
>> -                     "glDrawPixels(GL_DEPTH_COMPONENT, 
>> GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8_EXT)"
>> -                     " failed to generate GL_INVALID_OPERATION.");
>> +     if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_INVALID_ENUM)) {
>>               return false;
>
> Looks like the expected error got changed here.
>
>>       glReadPixels(0, 0, 1, 1, GL_STENCIL_INDEX, GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8_EXT, 
>> p);
>> -     if (glGetError() != GL_INVALID_OPERATION) {
>> -             sprintf(errorMsg,
>> -                     "glReadPixels(GL_STENCIL_INDEX, 
>> GL_UNSIGNED_INT_24_8_EXT)"
>> -                     " failed to generate GL_INVALID_OPERATION.");
>> +     if (!piglit_check_gl_error(GL_INVALID_ENUM)) {
>>               return false;
>
> and here.

Whoops. Not intended. Will fix.
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit

Reply via email to