From: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> We weren't specifying a DTD, which made validator.w3.org angry. There's no reason not to be strict or use SGML-based HTML, so go with XHTML.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> --- templates/index.html | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/templates/index.html b/templates/index.html index 400dde3..00a47bb 100644 --- a/templates/index.html +++ b/templates/index.html @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ -<html> +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> +<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";> <head> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"/> <title>Result summary </title> <link rel="stylesheet" href="index.css"/> </head> -- 1.8.1.4 _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
