On 05/18/2013 09:35 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
My problem with the current list format is its too complex, and is
trying to solve nonexistent problems. There is no reason one should need
to rename the test results in the HTML summary. It's only going to lead
to headaches later on trying to identify what is actually in that column
"corrected name".
I personally like either nothing, since it doesn't appear that is a
popular feature, or a simple space, coma, or new line separated list of
results files. Its clean, simple, and doesn't require much explanation.
Personally, I see no value in the ability to load a list of results
files. Specifying them on the command line works just fine. I had
assumed it was a newline or space separated list, but apparently it's
something more complicated. I don't even know the syntax, and I've been
using Piglit for years...
Does anybody even use that feature?
I also don't understand the need to rename the columns when specifying
the result files. If I want to rename a result (usually because I
typo'd when doing piglit-run), I just edit the file and change the name...
I'm not a fan of making this a fancy json syntax unless there's a real
compelling use case.
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
