On 10/02/2013 02:32 PM, Jon Ashburn wrote: > I am working on Piglit tests for arb_texture_view. I was considering > using C++11 features in STL (e.g. unordered_set). Any reason not to
What do you want to do that would significantly benefit from such features? For the most part, we want to keep individual piglit tests small, and generally small programs don't see much benefit from such features. One of the goals (alas, not requirements) of a piglit test is that someone debugging a driver failure in that test should be able to completely understand what the test is doing in a minute or two. > use these newer STL features if they are supported in the newer > versions of g++ as found on recent Ubuntu distributions? In particular, > wondering if compilers on other platforms which Piglit might support > have reasonably thorough C++11 support? > > For GNU compiler C++11 features require -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 > compiler options. > > I can always fall back to implementing test using non-C++11 features. > > Thanks, > Jon Ashburn > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
