I'm not sure you quoted the bit of spec you intended to, but that test looks pretty bogus at a first glance.
-- Chris On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:08 PM, chris <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all, > > I run this test(glslparsertest/glsl2/local-function-03.frag),and I think it > is may be bug of piglit. > > As spec, this test should be fail, but pass, since declaration function in > not in global scope should be an error. > > Is there anyone noticed this test? > > // [config] > // expect_result: pass > // glsl_version: 1.10 > // > // # NOTE: Config section was auto-generated from file > // # NOTE: 'glslparser.tests' at git revision > // # NOTE: 6cc17ae70b70d150aa1751f8e28db7b2a9bd50f0 > // [end config] > > /* PASS - local function declarations are not allowed in GLSL 1.10. */ > #version 110 > void main() { > float foo(float x); > gl_FragColor = vec4(0.0, foo(0.5), 0.0, 1.0); > } > > float foo(float x) { > return x + 0.5; > } > > In glsl 1.1.0 section 6.1.1: > The const qualifier cannot be used with out or inout, or a compile-time > error results. The above is used > both for function declarations (i.e., prototypes) and for function > definitions. Hence, function definitions > can have unnamed arguments. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit > _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
