On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 04:20:46PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > Chad Versace <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 09:47:45PM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > Likewise, yesterday as I began to go deeper into solving the EGL > > dispatch problem, and discovered a chain of interdependent problems that > > needed solving first, I believe I finally arrived at an initial node in > > the problem-dependency graph, on which many larger linker issues depend: > > piglit-dispatch does not yet support GLES1. > > > > I began to add GLES1 dispatch to Piglit, which was easier than > > I expected. Hopefully the chain of linking problems will begin to fall > > away as hacking proceeds. > > I've already rewritten our dispatch to use libepoxy, checkout the epoxy > branch of my piglit tree. It does EGL, GLX, WGL, GLES1/2/3, etc. This is the best thing I've heard all week, honestly. Do you have any timeline for merging your epoxy branch? My main purpose in working on GLES1 dispatch wasn't because I cared about dispatch, but because I was trying kill off CMake's "let's build Piglit three times!", and GLES1 dispatch was needed for that. But, since you've done all the heavy lifting, I can now fast-forward through a lot of details I didn't care about and start unifying the Piglit build on top of your epoxy branch. _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
