On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 07:41:04PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > [snip] > > > I'll throw a patch at the end of the series, do you want me to send > > I'm gonna take it back, sorry. I don't know that dmesg-warn should be > worse than warn, (same for fail) since pass -> dmesg-warn, warn -> > dmesg-fail, and fail -> dmesg-fail. Personally I was never a fan of having > special dmesg- statuses, I feel that a fail is a fail and warn is a warn, but > I'm not sure that change is correct.
The current ordering seems wrong to me, e.g. if you have a failing tests and fix up some dmesg noise you now have a regression. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
