On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 01:34:40PM -0700, Dylan Baker wrote: > Cool, I was mostly hoping that you and Daniel would look at them and see if > they worked for you and didn't break your workflow.
Yeah can't really do a real review either due to lack of python fu, but this looks neat. Thanks a lot for doing this. -Daniel > > - Dylan > > On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 02:34:57 Marek Olšák wrote: > > I cannot review this, because I'm not familiar with the code, but the > > last patch looks good to me and I like the overall idea. > > > > Marek > > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > This series separates the SKIP and NOTRUN status changes from fixes and > > > regressions and puts them into separate categories, enabled and > > > disabled. > > > > > > This makes two workflows possible where previously only one was: > > > 1) creating baselines that are full tests, and then using small focused > > > > > > runs to compare specific tests > > > > > > 2) running full comparisons, and being able to see when new tests are > > > > > > enabled or tests are disabled > > > > > > Patches 1-3 add test to demonstrate current behavior or to model future > > > behavior > > > > > > Patch 4 makes NOTRUN and SKIP a special subclass which when compared > > > using numerics (not == or !=) will resolve False > > > > > > Patch 5 Plumbs it all in -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
