I see requiring ARB_texture_storage is done inconsistently in
texture_view piglit tests that use TexStorage.
Thus, would either get a skip or a fail. A philosophical debate which
is better...I am okay either way.
Jon
On 03/25/2014 04:55 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Jon Ashburn <j...@lunarg.com> wrote:
+void
+piglit_init(int argc, char **argv)
+{
+ piglit_require_extension("GL_ARB_texture_view");
also require texture_storage.
I disagree, actually -- an implementation that exposes
ARB_texture_view without 4.2/ARB_texture_storage is broken, and so
we'd want to fail.
-- Chris
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
