On Tuesday, April 15, 2014 19:37:48 Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > This puts fullenv in Test.get_command_result() (since that's the only > > place it's actually used). Also don't pass self.command as an argument > > (with an additional assignment). > > > > Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > > --- > > > > framework/exectest.py | 16 ++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/framework/exectest.py b/framework/exectest.py > > index 3bbcabb..3bbaf1f 100644 > > --- a/framework/exectest.py > > +++ b/framework/exectest.py > > > > @@ -141,13 +141,7 @@ class Test(object): > > * For 'returncode', the value will be the numeric exit > > code/value. > > * For 'command', the value will be command line program and > > arguments. > > """ > > > > - fullenv = os.environ.copy() > > - for e in self.env: > > - fullenv[e] = str(self.env[e]) > > - > > > > if self.command is not None: > Hmmm... this test implies that the previous patch is wrong for the > valgrind case? I guess it should only return the valgrinded command if > self._command is not None as well. > > > - command = self.command > > - > > > > i = 0 > > skip = self.check_for_skip_scenario() > > > > while True: > > @@ -156,8 +150,7 @@ class Test(object): > > err = "" > > returncode = None > > > > else: > > - out, err, returncode > > > > self.get_command_result(command, - > > fullenv) + out, err, > > returncode = self.get_command_result()> > > # https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?idh0214 is > > # affecting many developers. If we catch it > > > > @@ -236,9 +229,12 @@ class Test(object): > > """ > > return False > > > > - def get_command_result(self, command, fullenv): > > + def get_command_result(self): > > + fullenv = os.environ.copy() > > + fullenv.update(dict((k, str(v)) for k, v in > > self.env.iteritems())) > > IMHO the previous way of doing this is way more readable. And > potentially more efficient if you merge the two approaches and use > iteritems on it as well instead of the (implicit) iterkeys.
OK, I'll change it to a loop. I have a background in Ruby, so I find python's lack of one-liners annoying. > > > + > > > > try: > > - proc = subprocess.Popen(command, > > + proc = subprocess.Popen(self.command, > > > > stdout=subprocess.PIPE, > > stderr=subprocess.PIPE, > > env=fullenv, > > > > -- > > 1.9.2 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Piglit mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
