The test looks fine enough, but could you add a spec quotation to defend it?
On 11/04/2014 04:19 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <[email protected]> > --- > tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > > diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..37031cf > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag > @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ > +#version 300 es The #version shouldn't be necessary with the current infrastructure, right? > +// [config] > +// expect_result: fail > +// glsl_version: 3.00 > +// [end config] > +// > +// Check that 'invariant(all)' cannot be used in fragment shader > + > +#pragma STDGL invariant(all) > +void main() > +{ > +} > _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
