On 11/07/2014 12:40 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
The test looks fine enough, but could you add a spec quotation to defend it?
ok, I'll send v2 of this together with few other tests
On 11/04/2014 04:19 AM, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <[email protected]>
---
tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
diff --git a/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..37031cf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/spec/glsl-es-3.00/compiler/invariant_all.frag
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+#version 300 es
The #version shouldn't be necessary with the current infrastructure, right?
I put it there as the other tests had it. Also GLSL ES 1.00 does not
have such error so this is specific to the version.
+// [config]
+// expect_result: fail
+// glsl_version: 3.00
+// [end config]
+//
+// Check that 'invariant(all)' cannot be used in fragment shader
+
+#pragma STDGL invariant(all)
+void main()
+{
+}
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
