Hi, sorry for the delay in answering I've not been able to devote much time for this lately.
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 13:25 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Ian Romanick <[email protected]> wrote: > > So... where did we end up with this? I just pushed a patch from the bug > > that makes shaders 4 and 5 actually run. Both fail, but Matt thought > > that the fix to Mesa was committed. > > Indeed, it's upstream as commit 8517e665. When introducing the patch in commit 8517e665 we were fixing fdo#82991. As there was not a piglit test for that case, in order to track regressions I extended the piglit "glsl-deriv-varyings" test with 3 more cases. The first one of those 3 was failing before mesa commit 8517e665 and is passing afterwards. The other 2 cases, however, fail before and after that commit. That means that, while extending "glsl-deriv-varyings" I found, AFAIU, 2 new bugs in mesa. I filed fdo#87407 to track those. However, I've tested those 2 new cases with swrast, nouveau, i965 and the proprietary NVIDIA driver in GNU/Linux and all of them fail consistently with the same results. Therefore, I'm not totally sure the expected results I added for those 2 extra cases are correct and I will welcome another pair of eyes. If the expected results are not correct, they should be corrected in the piglit test and, probably, fdo#87407 should be invalidated. Other than that, I agree with Ian that this test should be converted to shader_runner. I will try to find some time to do this. Hope this clarifies the status. -- Br, Andres _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
