On 09/09/2015 03:00 PM, Predut, Marius wrote: > Ping... > I have been waiting for the corresponding mesa patch to get clearance before pushing this one. Otherwise we risk bringing a regression for an undefined timespan.
Since I cannot test on PNV, I don't know if it the piglit test still passes after applying this (and before having the fix in mesa). If you can confirm it does, then it is no risk to push this already. Eduardo >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Piglit [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >> Eduardo Lima Mitev >> Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 10:19 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] aa: too sensitive at the line end points for >> PNV >> platform >> >> On 07/30/2015 04:51 PM, Predut, Marius wrote: >>> Still not upstream. >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Predut, Marius >>> Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2015 11:53 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Cc: Predut, Marius >>> Subject: [PATCH] aa: too sensitive at the line end points for PNV platform >>> >>> Adjust middles of the segments sample so that now the test pass also on PNV >> platform. >>> >>> Bspec documentation G45: Volume 2: 3D/Media Last Pixel Enable bit of >> SF_STATE controls whether the last pixel of the last line in a LINESTRIP_xxx >> primitive or the last pixel of each line in a LINELIST_xxx primitive is >> rendered. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Marius Predut <[email protected]> >>> --- >>> tests/general/line-aa-width.c | 6 +++--- >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/tests/general/line-aa-width.c b/tests/general/line-aa-width.c >> index c0fd7c1..e7998c4 100644 >>> --- a/tests/general/line-aa-width.c >>> +++ b/tests/general/line-aa-width.c >>> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ piglit_display(void) >>> * coverage in each column >>> */ >>> for (x1 = 2; x1 < piglit_width; x1 += seg_width) { >>> - int x2 = x1 + seg_width - 4; >>> + int x2 = x1 + seg_width - 5; >>> int sample_x; >>> float y1, y2; >>> float avg = 0.0; >>> @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ piglit_display(void) >>> float max = -100.0; >>> char *err = NULL; >>> >>> - if (x2 > piglit_width - 4) >>> - x2 = piglit_width - 4; >>> + if (x2 > piglit_width - 5) >>> + x2 = piglit_width - 5; >>> >>> /* If we don't have a couple of pixels to sample because we've >>> * hit the edge of the window, we're done. >>> -- >>> 1.9.1 >>> >> >> Looks fine, though I don't have available HW to confirm the test passes >> after applying corresponding Mesa patch. If somebody can confirm it, >> this patch is: >> >> Reviewed-By: Eduardo Lima Mitev <[email protected]> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Piglit mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit > _______________________________________________ > Piglit mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit > _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
