On 10/10/2015 12:12 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 10/09/2015 12:26 AM, Iago Toral wrote:
On Thu, 2015-10-08 at 15:13 +0300, Tapani Pälli wrote:
Signed-off-by: Tapani Pälli <[email protected]>
+ /* Step from -1.0 to 1.0, linear depth. Render a
+ * rectangle at depth i, read pixel and verify
+ * expected depth value.
+ */
+ for (i = -1.0; !equals(i, 1.0 + step); i += step) {
Since this is the only place where you call equals I think it is just
easier to do:
for (i = -1.0; i < 1.00001 + step; i += step) {
Why not just i <= 1.0?
I'll use the original 'equals', that way the parameters can be played
with and it won't break.
// Tapani
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
