On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Marek Olšák <marek.ol...@amd.com> > > This is a subset of the generated tests which are known to fail > on everything except CPU emulation (AFAIK). > ---
This is really awful. Committing a generated test, but with unknown bits chopped out is gross. If it were me, I'd want to understand why my hardware behaved differently -- not just hack up *different* tests and claim victory. FWIW, the generated tests pass on all Intel hardware exposing ARB_shading_language_packing. Gen7+ has native half-float support, and Gen6 uses the lowering code in lower_packing_builtins.cpp to turn the built-ins into a pile of instructions. If you can identify how AMD hardware behaves differently and can prove that the generator needs to be relaxed or something, that's cool. But as is, I hate this patch. I can't find anything in the AMD docs (I looked at GCN3) about half-precision support, so I can't check my theory that AMD hardware rounds towards zero instead of to-nearest/even like Intel. _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list Piglit@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
