Quoting Matt Turner (2016-02-09 10:03:59) > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> Quoting Matt Turner (2016-02-08 21:06:58) > >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > I just pushed patches to hybridize the framework to use either python > >>> > 3.3+ or 2.7. > >>> > > >>> > Everything should keep working as normal. Unless you have python 3.x, > >>> > then you'll need to rerun CMake to pick up the changes. > >>> > >>> There's still a handful of *.py files with #!/usr/bin/env python2: > >>> > >>> generated_tests/random_ubo-arb_uniform_buffer_object.py:#!/usr/bin/env > >>> python2 > >>> generated_tests/random_ubo.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> generated_tests/random_ubo_trim.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> piglit-print-commands.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> piglit-resume.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> piglit-run.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> piglit-summary-html.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> piglit-summary.py:#!/usr/bin/env python2 > >>> self-tests/test-installed-piglit-script-imports-correct-framework-module:#!/usr/bin/env > >>> python2 > >> > >> > >> I thought I'd mentioned that in the commit, but apparently I did only in > >> the cover letter. > >> > >> The random_ubo_stuff is not plugged into anything at the moment, and I > >> have a WIP branch for those, but getting the same output from python 2 > >> and python 3 for generators without numpy is tricky. > >> > >> The piglit-* command were left intentionally. They're legacy interfaces > >> and we don't add new ones when adding new functions to the 'piglit' > >> command (piglit summary aggregate, for example). Personally, I'd rather > >> get rid of them (other than print-commands, which I should probably > >> update). > > > > Really? I think it's a lot more straightforward to use them than the > > "piglit" megarunner thing... not sure why that was added tbh. But > > since the regular commands stayed, I didn't object at the time. Should > > I have? > > Yeah, I've continued using the piglit-run.py/piglit-summary.py > scripts. I don't know what I would gain by switching, but I would lose > the ability to tab complete their names. :)
One of these days I should really finish writing those zsh and bash completions I started, and then got frustrated by how difficult it is to write bash and zsh completions....
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
