On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 3:07 PM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 6 September 2016, Rob Clark <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Kristian Høgsberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: > > >> >> > If we have the gbm eglimage path, why do we keep the intel specific code >> > around? >> >> only plausible reason I could come up with is that gbm path depends on >> a fairly recent version of gbm to have the gbm_bo_map/unmap() bits.. >> if that isn't an issue, we should drop the intel path. Otherwise we >> should plan on eventually dropping intel path. >> > Unless things have changed over the last few hours, none of the classic dri > drivers expose map/unmap image. >
well, someone should fix that for i965 if it is still missing, otherwise i965 won't be able to use gralloc-gbm for android. Other classic drivers, I doubt it matters. Do any of them support dma-buf in the first place? BR, -R _______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
