resending trimmed to appease the ML On Mon, 2017-02-27 at 16:26 -0500, Jan Vesely wrote: > On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 01:16 -0800, Matt Arsenault wrote: > > > On Dec 8, 2016, at 16:21, Jan Vesely <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-12-05 at 09:48 -0800, [email protected] > > > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > > > > From: Matt Arsenault <[email protected]>
[SNIP]
> > >
> > > any reason why these are in a separate file rather than extending
> > > scalar_arithmetic_${TYPE} tests?
> > >
> > > Jan
> >
> > These aren’t testing that a basic operation is working, and are
> > aiming at specific optimizations.
>
> ok, I guess custom kernels make it different enough.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jan Vesely <[email protected]>
>
> I still don't like the idea of dumping 1000s of test lines into piglit.
> especially if it's generated it'd be nicer to have the generator
> instead.
>
> Jan
>
> PS: feel free to ping other patches that I missed
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Piglit mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
