On 22/06/17 22:12, Dylan Baker wrote:
Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-06-21 01:37:21)
On 06/20/2017 08:59 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
Quoting Petri Latvala (2017-06-20 05:41:11)
On 04/13/2017 09:46 PM, Dylan Baker wrote:
Quoting Brian Paul (2017-04-12 13:04:59)
On 04/12/2017 11:55 AM, Dylan Baker wrote:
It doesn't makes sense to run if a user has removed all tests from a
selected profile, and currently if all tests are removed, then an
assertion will be hit in the backend that isn't extremely clear about
what went wrong. This should be much easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Dylan Baker <[email protected]>
---
framework/profile.py | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/framework/profile.py b/framework/profile.py
index 4604367e1..ce0b24ce8 100644
--- a/framework/profile.py
+++ b/framework/profile.py
@@ -389,6 +389,13 @@ def run(profiles, logger, backend, concurrency):
profiles = [(p, list(p.itertests())) for p in profiles]
log = LogManager(logger, sum(len(l) for _, l in profiles))
+ # check that after the filters are run there are actually tests to run
+ for p, l in profiles:
+ if not l:
+ raise exceptions.PiglitUserError(
+ 'After running filters there are no tests in '
+ 'profile "{}"'.format(p.name))
Bumped into an issue caused by this commit with IGT tests.
When the last test of a run never finishes and you attempt to
piglit resume -n test-results-path
this exception is raised instead of the expected result of finishing up
the run.
--
Petri Latvala
That is expected with the command line you've supplied.
The -n/--no-retry option instructs piglit to not retry tests that started but
didn't finish, if you get the same behavior without the -n option that is a bug.
Dylan
What is the supported method then to loop resume until results.json.bz2
gets generated? Previous behaviour was that piglit reported that there's
nothing more to do and generated that.
--
Petri Latvala
I would use `piglit summary aggregate` to build the results.json.foo file.
Hi Dylan,
Petri is on vacation for some time, so let me provide a little more
background on why this patch is problematic for our use-case.
For automated IGT testing, we have a testlist and reboot the machine as
soon as we get a certain error condition or if the test takes more than
a specified timeout, which reboots the machine immediately (watchdog).
Once the machine has rebooted, we re-deploy the right kernel and resume
piglit testing, using the -n option. When the testing is over, piglit
generates the results.json.foo file and returns 0. At this point,
ezbench considers the execution as done and does its own things.
However, since this patch got introduced, if the last test got
interrupted, then piglit will raise the PiglitUserError exception which
is hard to interpret from outside as a way to say that all the tests
have been run and that we should be generating the report. This also
introduces an ill-tested codepath, so Petri and I were wondering why not
make it less confusing for the user by just realizing that there are no
tests left to run, and just generate the report at this point.
Any suggestion as to what we should be doing? Maybe we could only send
this error when no tests have been run already and there are no runs to
be run?
Thanks,
Martin
_______________________________________________
Piglit mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/piglit
